€1,799 iPhone Fold: More Than a Laptop, But CFOs Might Buy It

Apple's first foldable iPhone is expected to launch in late 2026 with a price between €1,500 and €2,000.

For context: • MacBook Air (2025): €1,299 • iPhone 16 Pro Max: €1,299 • iPad Pro 11": €899 • iPhone Fold (estimated): €1,799

Most consumer tech launches spark excitement. This one is sparking a different question:

"Why would anyone pay laptop prices for a phone?"

The answer depends on whether you see it as a phone or a productivity tool.

Reddit's r/apple and r/iphone communities have been debating the iPhone Fold for months. The discussion breaks into three camps:

Camp 1: "No one wants a folding iPhone!"

Upvotes: 755 on top thread

Key arguments:

• Mechanical hinge = failure point. Every folding phone has hinge durability issues. Apple's first-gen won't be perfect.
• Thickness when folded. Two iPhone Airs stacked = too thick for normal pockets.
• Battery life concerns. Bigger screen = more power draw. Foldables notoriously struggle with all-day battery.
• Crease visibility. Samsung Fold 7 still has a visible crease. Apple promises "crease-free" but Gen 1 skepticism is high.

Quote from thread:

"The crease is not the thing that was ever concerning to me. The mechanical hinge, and the thickness of a folded phone, and the battery life are the things I am more concerned about."

Camp 2: "This is a game-changer!"

Upvotes: 1,200+ on "iPhone Fold called 'game-changer'" thread

Key arguments:

• iPad replacement. Fits in your pocket, unfolds to iPad Mini size. No more carrying two devices.
• Real estate for productivity. Email, spreadsheets, documents—all benefit from bigger screens.
• Apple quality. Samsung Folds have creases and software bugs. Apple will do it right.
• Status symbol. €1,799 phone = "I value premium tools."

Quote from thread:

"This foldable iPhone would sell decently if it's priced right and if Apple sells it as also having the benefit of being like an iPad when unfolded."

Camp 3: "I'll wait for Gen 2."

Most common sentiment

Key arguments:

• Gen 1 = prototype pricing. €1,799 for first-gen durability risks is too high.
• No Face ID. Multiple leakers confirm Gen 1 won't have Face ID (hinge mechanism conflicts). Dealbreaker for security-focused users.
• "Scratchgate" fears. iPhone 16 Pro already has scratch complaints. Foldable screens are softer = worse scratches.

Quote from thread:

"I personally want to try an iPhone fold, but I'm not really sold on the lack of Face ID and I'm skeptical on buying a gen1 type of device: been burned too often by something that's essentially a prototype that's been pushed out to the public."

Here's where the discussion gets interesting for B2B decision-makers.

Most Reddit debates focus on consumer value. But for companies equipping executives, the math is different.

Argument 1: Device Consolidation

Current executive tech stack:

• iPhone 16 Pro Max: €1,299
• iPad Pro 11": €899
• Total: €2,198

With iPhone Fold:

• iPhone Fold: €1,799
• iPad: Not needed
• Savings: €399

If the foldable phone truly replaces the tablet, it's not a premium—it's a cost reduction.

Argument 2: Productivity Justification

CFOs don't buy tech for features. They buy it for productivity ROI.

If a €1,799 phone allows executives to:

• Review spreadsheets on flights without pulling out a laptop
• Respond to detailed emails with proper formatting
• Present documents in client meetings

...then the €500 premium over a standard iPhone is a productivity investment, not a luxury.

The calculation:

• Executive salary: €120K/year (€60/hour)
• Time saved per week: 2 hours (better screen real estate)
• Annual value: €6,240
• Phone premium: €500
• ROI: 1,148%

Of course, this assumes the productivity gains are real. Most won't be.

Argument 3: Status Signaling

Let's be honest: some companies approve expensive tech because it signals something.

What a €1,799 iPhone Fold signals:

• "We equip our executives with the best"
• "We're early adopters of innovation"
• "We value premium tools"

For client-facing roles (sales, consulting, executive leadership), the device an employee uses sends a message.

A €1,799 foldable iPhone says: "We invest in our people."

A scratched iPhone 12 says: "We're cost-conscious."

Neither is wrong. But the signal matters in high-stakes B2B environments.

The skeptics have a point: Gen 1 foldable = risk.

Samsung Fold users report:

• Hinge failures at 12-18 months
• Screen protector peeling (and removing it voids warranty)
• Crease deepening over time
• Dust/debris getting into the hinge

Apple promises "crease-free" and "durable hinge." But every manufacturer promises this.

For consumers, a €1,799 risk is personal. For companies, it's multiplied by headcount.

If your company equips 50 executives with iPhone Folds:

• Total investment: €89,950
• If 10% fail in Year 1: €8,995 replacement cost
• If 30% fail in Year 2: €26,985 replacement cost

Suddenly the "iPad replacement savings" disappear.

Multiple leakers (including Jeff Pu and Ming-Chi Kuo) confirm:

iPhone Fold Gen 1 will NOT have Face ID.

Why? The hinge mechanism conflicts with the TrueDepth camera system.

Instead, Apple will use:

• Touch ID (side button)
• Passcode

For consumer users, this is annoying. For enterprise users, it's a security downgrade.

Many B2B environments require:

• Biometric authentication (Face ID)
• MDM compliance
• Secure app access

Touch ID is less secure (spoofable, requires physical contact). If your company's security policy mandates Face ID, the iPhone Fold is a non-starter—regardless of price.

Here's the framework CFOs should use:

Is the iPhone Fold a WANT or a NEED?

It's a WANT if:

• Executives already have iPhones + iPads and use both regularly
• Productivity gains are speculative ("might be useful for...")
• Device consolidation isn't a priority
• Gen 1 durability risks outweigh benefits
• Security policy requires Face ID

Recommendation: Wait for Gen 2 (2027-2028). Let early adopters test durability.

It's a NEED if:

• Executives frequently complain about carrying multiple devices
• Client-facing roles benefit from premium device signaling
• Tablet usage is low (most work happens on phone anyway)
• Productivity ROI is measurable (time-tracking shows inefficiency)
• Company values early adoption as brand positioning

Recommendation: Pilot with 5-10 executives. Measure actual usage. Decide on broader rollout in 2027.

Apple's foldable iPhone will cost more than most business laptops.

For consumers, that's a luxury decision.

For CFOs, it's a ROI calculation:

If it replaces phone + tablet: €399 savings per user.

If it improves productivity: Potentially €6K+ value per executive.

If it fails in Year 1: €1,799 write-off + replacement cost.

The smart move? Pilot, measure, decide.

Don't approve €90K fleet purchases based on Apple's marketing. Test with 10 executives. Track:

• Device consolidation (did they stop using iPads?)
• Productivity gains (measurable time savings?)
• Durability (any failures in first 6 months?)
• Security compliance (Touch ID acceptable?)

If the pilot shows ROI, roll it out. If not, wait for Gen 2.

Because the question isn't "Is the iPhone Fold worth €1,799?"

It's "Can we prove it's worth €1,799 for our use case?"

---

Need help making B2B tech purchasing decisions with measurable ROI? Collecty works with European SMEs on cost optimization and working capital strategy. Learn more at cllcty.com.